Are You Traveling Responsibly?
We've all heard the words tossed around. Responsible tourism. Sustainable tourism. Green travel. But what do they mean?
Several years ago, World Travel Market, one of the world's largest travel events currently taking place in London, partnered with the United Nations World Tourism Organization to heighten awareness of responsible travel with the launch of a World Responsible Tourism Day. This year, World Responsible Tourism Day is Nov. 9.
So, what is responsible tourism? It’s a loaded question and one that has engendered much thought and speculation from those in the travel industry and who bring hoards of tourists to and through sites around the globe.
In 2002, nearly 300 tourism representatives from some 20 countries gathered in Cape Town, South Africa to try to define responsible tourism. According to them, responsible tourism is tourism that minimizes negative economic, environmental and social impacts on local communities; generates economic benefits for those communities and involves them in decisions that affect their lives; takes into account the conservation of natural and cultural heritage; provides more meaningful experiences for tourists through improved connections with local people that emphasize local cultural, social and environmental issues; and provides access for disabled travelers; among other things.
"Tourism is one of the fastest growing industries and a strong contributor to sustainable development and poverty alleviation," the Global Sustainable Tourism Council notes on its website.
The GSTC is focused on ensuring that the 1.6 billion tourists who will be traveling the world by the year 2020 (according to a UNWTO forecast) potentially do more good than harm by responsibly and sustainably contributing to local economies.
"It's a matter of what the relationship is when you make that visit," Harold Goodwin, professor at the International Centre for Responsible Tourism in Leeds, U.K., has said about the impact of privileged travelers heading into less privileged communities. "If it's purely voyeuristic, if all you're doing is going to look at the poor and take photographs, that seems to me to be exploitative and unacceptable."
But, said Goodwin, “Not to be exploited, not to be economically engaged, not to have the opportunity to earn from these things is far worse."
What about you? What are your thoughts about responsible tourism? Are you aware of your footprint and the impact you have as a traveler?
More from Budget Travel:
5 Tips for Sharper Holiday Photographs
Holiday lights and decorations brighten up cities and towns, but capturing those images can be tricky. Or at least, it can be tricky to get your family to look good in them. Improve your shots in a snap with our five tips, gleaned from travel photographers and Budget Travel readers. Frame the photo, and then "insert" your subjects Most people do the opposite, driving their families crazy while they stand waiting. In other words, when trying to get a photo of your family with, say, the National Christmas Tree in Washington, D.C., frame the tree first. Then have your family step into the frame, as it were, and stand close together. Get closer. As Life magazine and Magnum photographer Robert Capa once said, "If the pictures aren't good enough, you're not close enough.'" Be silly. Before you say "Cheese!" look up from the camera and say something silly to your subjects. The distraction of looking at your face and responding to what you're saying will relax their faces and often loosen up their frozen grins. You can snap the photo without looking through the view finder. Consider setting your camera to a "quick shot," rapid-fire setting that takes multiple photos at once. That will boost your chances of getting a shot with everyone wearing easy smiles. Have your subjects wear bright clothes. Blacks, whites, and greys may look nice to the naked eye—especially to trendy residents of New York City and L.A., ha ha—but bright colors, such as red, yellow, and orange, "pop" in pictures. Brighten your wardrobe with a colorful hat, scarf, or sweater, and your pictures will brighten up, too. Shoot at golden hour, for outdoor shots. Namely, dusk and dawn. For sites to help you figure out when golden hour will strike at your destination, try golden-hour.com or Twilight Calculator. (For details, see our previous blog post "Tools to find the "Golden Hour".) SEE MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL Readers' Best Winter Photos How to Take Better Food Photos How to Take Better Sunset Photos
What Makes Your Least Favorite Airport So Awful?
Perhaps the only thing more associated with Thanksgiving than turkeys and pilgrims is airport-induced rage. Hours of delays, lost luggage, and never-ending security lines can surely leave a bad taste in your mouth. A major part of your holiday happiness, therefore, can be tied to the airports through which you travel. If you're lucky enough to get a good one, flying can be a breeze: the sunny halls, central-hub design, and easy-to-navigate tram system at Tampa International Airport means I never have to worry about being a Thanksgiving Grinch on my way home for the holidays. But millions of other travelers aren't so lucky. CNN.com compiled a list this week of the most hated airports around the world, with reasons why each earned this dubious distinction: 10. São Paulo-Guarulhos International, São Paulo, Brazil: "just 41 percent of all flights leave on time" 9. Perth Airport, Perth, Australia: "a reviled pair of domestic terminals (home of two-hour taxi-line queues, atrocious check-in lines, overpopulated gates and meager lounges)" 8. Tribhuvan International, Kathmandu, Nepal: "primitive yet officious check-in procedure, starring a roulette wheel of underpaid security agents" 7. John F. Kennedy International, New York, United States: "a dim, surly, unbearably congested airport reeking with attitude and unapologetically long immigration lines" 6. Jomo Kenyatta International, Nairobi, Kenya: "cramped spaces; long lines; inadequate seating; frequent power outages; tiny washrooms hiding up several flights of stairs; shabby duty free shops; overpriced food outlets; and business class lounges worthy of a shelter in mid-city Los Angeles" 5. Ninoy Aquino International, Manila, Philippines: "ground crew strikes, unkempt conditions, soup kitchen-style lines that feed into more lines and an overall sense of futility" 4. ToncontÍ n International, Tegucigalpa, Honduras: "second most dangerous airport in the world" 3. London Heathrow, London, England: "long walks (or, more commonly, runs) between gates to a frenzied soundtrack of ‘last call' announcements" 2. Los Angeles International Airport, Los Angeles, United States: "a dramatically undersized and moribund one with the architectural élan of a 1960s correctional facility" 1. Paris-Charles de Gaulle, Paris, France: "the baffling circular layout is worsened by warrens of tunnel-like structures, dismissive staff and seething travelers waiting forever in the wrong queue...the worst part may be this airport's aura of indifference to it all" More often than not, we don't hate an airport for something major, such as Tegucigalpa's spotty safety record. It can be the little things that bug us: long taxi lines, lengthy walking times between terminals, uncomfortable seats, too few outlets. What's your least favorite airport—and what makes it so terrible? SEE MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL: Replace Heathrow? London Just Might Survey: Travelers Just Love Alternative Airports 5 Airport Innovations Worth Praising
Are holiday sweaters the new TSA target?
We've heard about the trouble with snow globes. And wrapped gifts. And even big hairdos. And when I checked in at Washington DC's Reagan National Airport last weekend, I probably should have known I was setting myself up for scrutiny. After all, our story "7 Surprising Items That Set Off Airport Security" pointed out that even the tiniest bit of gum-wrapper foil wadded up in a pocket can set off airport metal detectors. And yet, it never occurred to me that my snazzy gold sweater—shot through with lurex threads—would earn me a TSA patdown. "Cute top, but not airport friendly," the TSA agent said as she searched me for weapons. Apparently, the metallicized thread in the sweater yarn was making the scanner go crazy. That got me thinking about all the other ways a festive holiday sweater could cause a travel delay: jingle bells dangling from Rudolph's harness, tiny metal ornaments, and the worst offender of all—battery-powered mini-lights strung on an intarsia Christmas tree. Okay, so probably no savvy Budget Travel reader would be silly enough to try to fly in a battery-powered sweater, but gold threads? An easy mistake to make—and lucky for you, reader, one that I've made for you. Have you ever been singled out for a similarly silly-seeming reason? What are the most surprising things you've been pulled aside for by the TSA? SEE MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL: 8 Most Common Air Travel Snafus Top Budget Travel Destinations for 2012 8 Items You Never Pack...But Should
Replace Heathrow? London Just Might
London's Heathrow Airport is the world's busiest international airport, but it's too full and it can't grow any further. Protests by local residents have prevented an additional runway and terminal from being built. Rival airport Gatwick faces a similar problem. So, government officials have turned their eye south to the idea of building a brand new airport where no local residents can possibly protest it—in the middle of the Thames Estuary. Earlier this month, the plan for a new airport was unveiled to the public by famous British architect Norman Foster. The Thames Hub would be set on an island near the mouth of the Thames River. It would be connected to the city by a $10 billion "orbital shuttle train," says the Times of London. The airport could be partly financed by private investment or international sovereign wealth funds, claim officials. This weekend, the Financial Times reported that the idea of building an alternative hub airport south of London has won support from key players: Chancellor George Osbourne (who oversees the British Treasury), the new Transport Secretary Justine Greening, and the prime minister's main policy advisor Steve Hilton. The mayor of London Boris Johnson has been advocating for a new airport since he released a report in January saying the city's economic future depends on such expansion. Air passenger numbers are expected to double in the next 20 years, and British officials worry that airlines may re-route their flights to rival, larger airports, such as Schiphol in Amsterdam, Charles de Gaulle in Paris, Frankfurt am Main, and Dubai International. Unlike these airports, Heathrow has not been expanded since it was first built in 1946. Its two runways already operate at 98 percent of capacity on the typical day. Britain isn't the first to consider moving its main transit hub to a larger airport. Moving a hub airport is something other cities, such as Milan, Hong Kong, Paris, and Tokyo, have done successfully. Governments have talked of expanding London's airport capacity since the 1960s, though. The debate is likely to continue for another couple of years before a final decision. So travelers shouldn't expect relief any year soon. What do you think about Heathrow? Does it deserve replacing? SEE MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL London: Heathrow Airport Debuts Driverless Pods Avoid Heathrow! Pod Hotel Lands at Heathrow