Citibank and Chase drop foreign exchange fees on some cards

By Sean O'Neill
October 3, 2012
blog_foex_original.jpg
Courtesy <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bradipo/1435739708/">bradipo/Flickr</a>

Until now, the easiest way to avoid paying credit-card fees for foreign purchases was to use a Capital One card (which has no annual fee). It has been the only major brand card that skips the 2% that AmEx tacks on or the 3% Visa and MasterCard charges.

But there's good news: CitiBank has rolled out cards without foreign exchange fees. To simplify its lineup of rewards-based ThankYou credit cards, Citi debuted a couple of cards, basic and preferred, that waive foreign currency conversion fees.

CORRECTION (Jan. 25):

Citi has introduced a couple of cards with no fees for foreign transactions, but they are the Premier and the Prestige cards, which have customary annual fees of $125 and $500, respectively. They're not the basic and preferred cards. Sorry for the error.

Citi's conversion rates are lower than those associated with exchanging cash.

Last month, Chase dropped foreign currency fees on its co-branded cards with British Airways, Hyatt, and Intercontinental Hotels. These cards generally charge significant annual fees.

If getting a new credit card doesn't appeal to you, consider signing up for a credit union debit card—that's treated as a Visa card by overseas operators by belonging to a major banking network—for all purchases and currency exchanges. At a typical 1% for foreign exchange, it's a good deal. But as reader kyvoyageur has pointed out before:

"The only exception is for car rental, where saving the cost of insurance using a regular VISA card far outweighs the 3% transaction charge."
Good point.

For more info, check out BT's story "What Your Bank Won't Tell You About Currency Conversion."

Here's hoping the no-fee trend spreads to other cards!

MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL

Travelex Chip and Pin Card makes paying abroad easier

Southwest waters down its Rapid Rewards program

How to game Continental's new FareLock service

Plan Your Next Getaway
Keep reading

TripAdvisor adds airline ratings to flight search

TripAdvisor, the giant of user reviews, keeps inventing ways to wring value from its supersize community. The site first moved into the world of airfare meta-search in 2009, but today it announced a feature that helps it stand out from the pack: This being TripAdvisor, you now get to see how other travelers have rated the airline on eight measures, such as baggage handling, check-in experience, punctuality, and seat comfort. Users can give ratings (but not full reviews yet) by logging in through Facebook or their own TripAdvisor account. A fees estimator is also another first-of-its-kind perk. Search for flights on TripAdvisor, and you'll see results that account for fees for checking one bag&mdash;letting you see the total price up-front in the results. Click on the price including a bag fee to refine the results further. Tell the site how many bags each passenger is checking and whether any passenger has status in a frequent flyer program that might waive fees. The results will be re-calculated to your exact situation. TripAdvisor is clearly continuing to innovate. No wonder the site was awarded a Budget Travel Reader's Choice Award (favorite site for hotel reviews) and an Budget Travel Extra Mile Award in 2010. What will be next? Prominently displayed user reviews of airports and entertainment? Reviews and ratings of rental car services? We're eager to find out. MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL 5 best travel sites More airports consider ditching TSA 17 free-admission days at national parks this year

More airports consider ditching TSA

Some of the the country's largest airports are thinking about hiring private firms to replace the Transportation Security Administration's front-line screeners. Sixteen airports, including San Francisco and Kansas City, have switched since 2002, says The Washington Post. Charlotte, N.C., Minneapolis-St. Paul, and Dulles Airport in Washington, D.C., are all considering converting to private contractors, says MSNBC. With private screeners, the security line moves the same way it does when TSA employees handle the process. Passengers take off their shoes, and they are just as likely to face the same pat-downs or full-body scanners as before. The private security firms themselves are vetted by TSA administrators, and their front-line screeners work under TSA rules. Republican Rep. John Mica of Florida, the new chairman of the House Transportation Committee, recently contacted about 200 airports to ask them to switch, reports NPR. Congressman Mica explained his reasoning in a recent editorial: TSA has grown from 16,500 screeners to an army approaching 67,000 personnel.... Rather than operate a huge screening force and human-resources operation, TSA must refocus and direct its mission to develop and implement the best security protocols and procedures. TSA officials respond that the agency is allowed to fire underperforming workers on the spot, in an exception to ordinary rules for federal employees. So there is no advantage on that score to hiring private contractors. Plus, no one has also shown that the government would save money by outsourcing the TSA's screening work to private contractors. TSA Chief John Pistole told ABC News that undercover tests have shown too many weapons getting through airport security. He said that is partly why, last November, he ordered screenings to be beefed up with enhanced pat-downs and full-body scanning machines that can see beneath a traveler's clothing. Even if airports switch to private screening, these enhanced procedures won't go away. What do you think? Should airports fire TSA screeners and hire private contractors? MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL How to speed through security 8 outrageous tales of bizarre behavior at security Security: Can new technology read a flier's mind?