Cuba prepares for an end to the travel ban

By Sean O'Neill
October 3, 2012

A year ago, we blogged about Congress's debate over lifting the travel ban for Americans to Cuba. Here's an update…

Cuban officials are banking that the ban will end soon, and they have begun to prepare for a boom in business. The country recently announced plans to open nine new hotels this year, adding about 50,000 rooms to the island. (For perspective, consider that Las Vegas added only 14,000 rooms in the past year.)

Unofficially, travel to Cuba has already picked up. More and more Americans are visiting thanks to legal loopholes that allow "research trips." Two years ago, the State Department were very selective about who was obtain to visas for these trips, and few citizens were allowed to go. But today, Americans who aren't specialized academics, musicians, or full-time missionaries are often being granted visas because of more lenient U.S. officials, says The Miami Herald. A few tour groups use websites to tout their expertise in making the system work.

Illegal travel also appears to be on the rise, too. By not having their passport book stamped in Cuba, travelers can avoid U.S. punishment. "U.S. customs officers don't issue citations for violations of the U.S. Cuba policy, but rather refer cases to the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control," reports the AP. Interestingly, the Treasury Department has not prosecuted any American in recent years for violating the law.

Sadly, the dictatorship's mistreatment of dissidents continues.

And that angers U.S. officials, delaying the effort to lift the ban. On the one hand, the Senate's Freedom to Travel to Cuba Act has the 60 votes needed to pass, according to its champion, Sen. Byron Dorgan. But the companion bill in the House of Representatives faces an uphill battle. It has 178 supporters so far, and it needs 40 more votes to pass. President Obama has not said where he stands on the issue.

It doesn't look like the ban will be lifted for another year or two. But many more Americans will be visiting thanks to lax enforecment of the law.

Would you be eager to visit?

EARLIER

Cuba: Change travelers can believe in? (41 comments)

Plan Your Next Getaway
Keep reading
Product Reviews

Security: Can new technology read a flier's mind?

The attempted Christmas Day bombing of a Northwest Airlines jet showed that airport security remains flawed. The TSA is trying to come up with new tactics to keep terrorists off of our planes. Is there anything smarter than can be done? We've blogged in the past about pre-screening passengers by filtering info from law enforcement databases, collecting "biometric data" with iris scans and other tests, and making passengers walk through whole-body scanners instead of mere metal detectors. Here are a few technologies that could help spot potential terrorists before it's too late, similar to the systems for detecting "pre-crimes" used in the Tom Cruise movie "Minority Report." ROBOTIC MIND READING Under this system being tested in Israel, passengers would be shown photographs of known terrorists and studied for how they react. Passengers with guilty consciences or a touch of paranoia may react to the stress physically. Infrared cameras would measure jumps in a traveler's heart rate and breathing rate. If the passenger's vital signs reveal hidden nervousness, the passenger may be questioned further by officers. POP QUIZ STRESS TEST Imagine you're approaching the airport security gate. You step up to a machine and put your passport on a scanner and rest the palm of your hand on a sensor. Then you answer a series of written questions that are flashed on a screen (or are spoken to you in audio mode, if you prefer). A machine measures your body's reactions during this question-and-answer session. Are you acting suspicious? You'll be pulled aside for further questioning. Such a scenario may not be a sci-fi fantasy anymore. New technology, memorably named SDS-VR-1000, is being tested to do precisely this. KEEPING TABS ON THE SECURITY WORKERS A tragedy might go unprevented if an officer is distracted and daydreaming while the image of a bomb comes across their X-ray screen. But new monitoring equipment—similar to cardiogram machines—would continuously study employees to spot check their competency and help managers know when their employees need to take breaks. The technology, being develped by Eltel, is similar to the camera-monitoring system used by casinos to catch any signs of suspicious behavior by their staff or customers. Do any of these programs work? The verdict is still out. Consider those infrared devices used to tell if a passenger's heart rate is speeding up. The machines sound awfully similar to those thermal imaging devices that are supposed to detect whether a passenger is running a fever—and which are not effective, according to a recent study. False alarms are another worry. Many innocent passengers are bound to be mistakenly fingered as possible bad guys. Even if the devices were 99.999 percent accurate—which would be surprisingly good—they would set off about 20 false alarms a day nationwide. Yet for many Americans, the inconvenience and added expense could be worth it. What do you think? How would you feel about being exposed to "incriminating stimuli" at the airport security gate to see how you react?

DOT Secretary on Spirit Air: 'I don't think they care about their customers'

Department of Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood has some strong opinions regarding Spirit's decision to start charging passengers for carry-on bags. In an interview posted at Christopher Elliott's blog, LaHood said that the DOT was going to "hold the airline's feet to the fire" on its decision to charge for carry-ons, and for the misleading way fares are listed, with a cheap up-front price followed by all sorts of fees down the line. LaHood says: I think they should fully disclose to people—either if they're calling or if they're looking at a computer screen—in a way that's legible and clearly readable, so that if they are going to charge you, you board the plane and you put your bag above the seat, that whatever that charge is, people can see that. This idea of trying to deceive people with some little amount of print that nobody can read, or somewhere tucked away, I don't agree with that. And we're gonna hold the airline's feet to the fire on this. Because we have an obligation to do it and we have the ability to do it. I think it's a bit outrageous that an airline is going to charge someone to carry on a bag and put it in the overhead. And I've told our people to try and figure out a way to mitigate that. I think it's ridiculous. When asked if Spirit has crossed the line, LaHood said flatly: I don't think they care about their customers. That's what I think. He also commented on Ryanair's recent decision to begin charging passengers to use the bathroom on planes: I think when you charge somebody to use the bathroom, you don't care about your customers. I mean, it's pretty clear. Based on the response to our post on Spirit's fees for carry-ons, LaHood isn't the only one with strong feelings about the topic. Here, a few excerpts of the 125 (and counting) reader comments, which, while mostly anti-Spirit, are actually more mixed than one might imagine: This is just another reason not to fly this airline, which is the worst I've ever seen in terms of nickel and diming customers. They charge for water, assigned seats, checked luggage and now carry ons. Their prices may look cheaper than other airlines on the surface, but add in all these costs, and they're no longer such a budget option. I have noticed bags getting bigger to save luggage fee, but if airlines push costs too high, people will stop flying. I use Southwest Air almost exclusively, because their very good, but also no baggage handling fees. I would rather see handling fee on carry on baggage, than checked baggage, as it would solve overhead problems, or very minimal size for overhead baggage. This is ridiculous! As a frequent flyer, I can tell you that I WILL NEVER fly Spirit. If they are that pressed for money, raise the price of the ticket. Its just insulting for the CEO to try to sell this as a way for us to "customize" out travel. We are smart enough to know the deal -- you can't efficiently manage the costs of your business so you try to bleed customers dry rather than tightening up your business. This is no more than a blatant money grab -- plain and simple. I love it!!! If people had used carry-on for just that -- not stuffing everything they owned into a small wheelie suitcase, there would not be so many complaints. Maybe now we will be able to board a flight in a reasonable amount of time and not have to walk all the way down the aisle to find a place for your coat since the overhead is so full of oversized carry-ons. I think Spirit's intentions, as well as American, Delta and United, are insulting. Do these carriers really think that the traveling public is that stupid and that loyal that they will accept anything that the carriers wish to charge??? They flunked Marketing 101. Even though I dislike it, charging for checked bags makes some sense in that airlines could ship freight at a higher rate than checked bags. Charging for carry-ons has no basis in business sense, nor any real practical basis. Smells of the sort of profiteering we've witnessed in other circumstances within this industry. This is why I have stopped flying as much as possible. The hassles at the airport and on the plane suck the fun out of traveling. I'll drive to local spots when possible or maybe take the train.

Inspiration

San Francisco: Urban ziplining in the Embarcadero

The word "zipline" usually conjures images of treetops in Costa Rica or summer camps (or humongous cruise ships). But during the recent Vancouver Olympics, one of the most popular events with visitors was the urban zipline hosted by Ziptrek Ecotours. Now the company has set up a temporary 600-foot zipline running across Embarcadero Square. The fun started yesterday and lasts through April 18. Rides are free. The zipline is part of the British Columbia Experience, a tourism effort that includes art installations and interactive video displays. But that doesn't make flying over the Embarcadero&mdashl;with amazing views of the Bay—any less exhilarating. For proof, see one local blogger's trip down the line. Holler at us if you decide to take this thrill ride. I know that's where I'll be this weekend. Justin Herman Plaza, at Market Street and Embarcadero. Through April 18, 10:00 a.m.–7:00 p.m.

Product Reviews

Can the iPad truly take you new places?

Unless you've been stuck under a rock for the past week, there's a new device on the market called the iPad. Some are calling it a "game-changer," some are calling it an unnecessary extra. What remains to be seen is whether it will become a useful tool for travelers — and one worth the $500 (starting) price tag. In the effort of sussing that out, I'll be bringing one along with me this weekend on a trip to New Orleans, for the French Quarter Festival. I'll be mapping, eating, and, you know, dancing in the streets. Since these tech toys are only as good as the apps you download onto them, I'd like to know what you think I should test. Are there apps you're interested in hearing about? Challenges you want me to overcome? Questions you'd like answered? Send 'em my way today and I'll report back next week.