Budget Travel

Your membership includes:

  • Access to our exclusive booking platform with private rates.
  • Newsletters with weekend getaways, trip ideas, deals & tips.
  • Sweepstakes alerts and more...
  • Don’t have an account?Get a FREE trial membership today. No credit card needed. Sign up now.
  • FREE trial membership. No credit card needed. Limited time only. Already have an account? Log in here.
    By creating an account, you agree to our Terms of Service and have read and understood the Privacy Policy
Close banner

Less salt in the wound: Solo traveler savings

By Michelle Baran
updated September 29, 2021
Courtesy Abercrombie & Kent USA, LLC

The economics of it make sense, but it just inherently seems like adding insult to injury when companies charge single supplements.

So, when an upscale travel company like Abercrombie & Kent says it's going to waive or reduce single supplements by up to 75%, singles of the world can breathe an appreciative "thank you" to the travel universe.

First off, solo travelers, you aren't alone. Well, you are, but you're not. Last year, solo travelers made up 10 percent of all A&K;'s bookings.

Hence, A&K; is offering more than 30 "solo savings" departures on several of its more popular itineraries.

The trips that now have no single supplement on select departures include: the 11-day Snows of Kilimanjaro (from $5,340, single supplement was $945); the 10-day Tanzania Wildlife Discovery (from $5,650, single supplement was $530); the 11-day Wings Over Kenya (from $8,775, single supplement was $1,625); and the 11-day Egypt Unveiled (from $5,165, single supplement was $1,380).

A&K; also reduced the single supplement on select departures of its 12-day Highlights of China tour (from $5,475 + $945 single supplement, was $1,890); and its 13-day Turkey: A Journey Through History itinerary (from $9,975 + $951 single supplement, was $3,805).

Singles Travel International also has some affordable options for single travelers in the form of their Weekend Sample Tours. The short, two- and three-day getaways are to closer-to-home destinations like Nashville, Vegas and the Bahamas.

"The weekend tours are the perfect 'mini vacations' to try solo travel without a big commitment," said Tammy Weiler, founder and president of Singles Travel International.

Examples include a Fourth of July Party Cruise, July 1-4, 2011, to the Bahamas from Miami on the Majesty of the Seas, which includes private STI parties, and singles-only dinner seating (starts at only $479 per person); and Musical Nashville Weekend, May 27-30, 2011, which includes three nights accommodations, meals and live music (starts from $759 per person).

Who said there was anything wrong with being single?

More from Budget Travel:

Going It Alone

River cruise deals: 2 for 1 specials, no single supplements, and more

Solo travel: Avoid getting "singled out" for fees on cruise ships

Keep reading
Travel Tips

Study: No significant health threat from TSA's full-body screening

In response to the Christmas Day bomber in 2009, the Transportation Security Administration pursued its plan to place full-body scanners at all American airports. Since then, the TSA has faced a barrage of criticism regarding privacy and safety concerns. But a new report released Monday by The Archives of Internal Medicine tries to assuage safety concerns, stating that there is no significant threat of radiation from TSA's full-body scanners, even among frequent flyers. "Based on what is known about the scanners, passengers should not fear going through the scans for health reasons, as the risks are truly trivial," the report states. Individuals are routinely exposed to ionizing radiation from everyday life, the study claims, and the scans deliver an amount of radiation equivalent to three to nine minutes of the radiation received through normal daily living. The study says that the backscatter x-ray scanner, the full-body scanner used more commonly in the United States, delivers only a small fraction of the energy of a cell phone. The study also says the doses of radiation are exceedingly low compared with those routinely received in the health care context: An individual would have to undergo more than 50 airport scans to equal the exposure of a single dental radiograph, 1,000 airport scans to equal the exposure of a chest radiograph, 4000 airport scans to equal the exposure of a mammogram, and 200,000 airport scans to equal the exposure of a single abdominal pelvic computed tomographic scan. If you have a fear of the minimal radiation exposure, the researchers suggest avoiding flying altogether, as naturally occurring radiation is higher at the altitudes of commercial air flights because of the greater proximity to the sun. The backscatter x-ray scans deliver radiation equivalent to around one to thee minutes of flight time. Put into context of an entire six-hour flight, the scan will increase a woman's exposure by less than 1 percent. But as much as this report tries to lesson the safety concerns of the scanners, it doesn't do much to dissuade us of the privacy concerns. The scanners have the ability to store and export scanned images, functions the TSA says are only used for testing, evaluation, and training, whereas the scanners used in airports cannot save or export images. "Even with these assurances," the study claims, "reports of tens of thousands of scanner images that were improperly saved and disseminated have raised concerns as to whether these assertions are true." Public unease with these scans exists not only due to the health and privacy concerns, but also, according to the study, because the TSA does not permit independent assessment of the machines. "It would seem prudent for the TSA to permit additional testing to verify the safety of the devices." Update: The Federal Marshall Service, not the TSA, improperly saved and disseminated scanned images. According to Rebecca Smith-Bindman, one of the authors of this study, they received no funding for this study and have never received funding from the TSA. What do you think about TSA's full body scanners? Do you have health and privacy concerns? MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL Today's travelers are more empowered than ever (plus: other emerging travel trends) News: Highway 1 hit by massive mudslides Hilarious new safety video from Air New Zealand

Travel Tips

#TBT: Have You Seen This Hilarious Airline Safety Video Featuring Richard Simmons?

Happy #ThrowbackThursday! This blog post was one of the first ones I ever wrote for Budget Travel back when I first started out as an Online Editorial Intern in 2011. #TBT In the latest off-the-wall safety demonstration video from Air New Zealand, exercise guru Richard Simmons makes sure everyone onboard is 'Fit to Fly.' This three minute and thirty-seven second spot of airline safety was shown [on flights in 2011] in all its sequined glory. Everyone in the video looks like they had a great time filming, including Amazing Race host, Phil Keoghan, who has a cameo toward the middle. Simmons and the rest of the flight crew, decked out in ultimate 80s exercise fashion and sweating to the beat, take you through the usual airline warm-ups—putting on your seat belt, stowing your baggage and knowing what to do in case of an emergency—with such flair you almost wish every airline safety video was this exciting. When demonstrating how to lift baggage into the overhead compartment and store it under the seat, Simmons yells, "Stretch and slide! Yeah! You're a giraffe!" He later encourages passengers to count the rows ("and two...three...four") to the emergency door closest to their seats. In a demonstration showing the airplane's exits and explaining how the emergency lights will turn on, he says, "Come on everyone, let's pony!" and leads the crew to safety. This is not the first wacky safety-demo video to come out of Air New Zealand. In 2009, we wrote about the controversial "Bare Essentials of Safety" video in which the flight crew appeared covered in nothing but body paint to resemble their uniforms. Is this the craziest airline safety video you've ever seen? Who would you like to see in one? Please share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Travel Tips

Should souvenirs be authentic and locally sourced?

Many travelers prize an authentic, locally sourced souvenir. if (WIDGETBOX) WIDGETBOX.renderWidget('1521e6e3-3e7f-47a7-8af3-e72c43a26923');Get the Poll Creator Pro widget and many other great free widgets at Widgetbox! Not seeing a widget? (More info)I define "souvenir" as something you buy during a trip as a memento. It doesn't have to be sold at a tourist gift shop. Is it important to you that your souvenir be made locally? If so, why? Is it because you want to support local businesses? Or to accurately capture what the local vibe is like? Souvenirs have become political in our nation's capital—surprise, surprise. Congressmen have pressured the National Museum of American History to stock only "made in the U.S.A." products. Soon, the shelves of one of the museum's gift shops will only sell American goods, reports the Washington Post. But there's a wider relevance here to the question of where souvenirs come from. If you're traveling a great distance on your precious vacation time—here or abroad—would you want to buy a memento that is different from what you can get at your hometown shopping mall? If you're visiting Moscow, would you want Matryoshkas made locally—and not in China? When vacationing in Venice, would you want glassware made at the local factories of Murano, instead of in China? Ditto for rug shopping in Istanbul. Shopping local is a way to help the businesses that give a place the qualities worth visiting. Please speak up in the comments. Do you look for authentic, locally sourced goods when shopping on a vacation? MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL Supermarket Souvenirs: Five globe-trotting shoppers share their unusual goodies from around the world. 20 Museum Gifts from Around the World A slide show How to Haggle Like an Expert Bizarre Traveler Behavior What's the Deal With Duty-free?

Travel Tips

Rental cars: Which ones are the safest

Some rental cars are safer than others. USA Today crunched the numbers on new makes and models rented by the eight largest U.S. chains. The paper relied on ratings from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. One out of four cars have "poor" ratings in a few types of accidents: side, rear, and rollover. USA Today found six 2011 vehicles and one 2010 vehicle with "poor" side-impact crash ratings: the Hyundai Accent, Kia Rio, the Volkswagen New Beetle, the two-door Jeep Wrangler, GMC Canyon, the Chevrolet Colorado with a crew cab, and the 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser. Three 2010 vehicles — the Chrysler PT Cruiser, the Infiniti M35 and the Hummer H3 — are rated "poor" in rear-crash ratings. The safest small, economy-class 2011 cars are the four-door Honda Civic, the Mitsubishi Lancer, and the Subaru Impreza. More details at USA Today. How about with you? Have you ever considered safety when picking a rental car? MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL Hot deal! Arizona car rentals for $5 a day from Hertz Rental cars: AutoSlash may find cheaper rates than you Hipmunk: Finding "ecstasy" in affordable lodging