Airline to passenger: "Sorry, we've lost the corpse."

By Sean O'Neill
October 3, 2012

It would be funny if it weren't so sad.

After his wife passed away from cancer on March 28, Miguel Olaya made arrangements with a Brooklyn, N.Y., funeral home to repatriate her body to their native Ecuador. The funeral home flew the body on American Airlines. Unfortunately, the airline lost the body, says the New York Daily News. An official accidentally entered the wrong code, and the casketed body was sent to the capital of Guatemala instead.

Here's how Gothamist describes the result:

By the time Olaya got his wife's remains, she was too badly decomposed for the planned three day wake.

Either the casket hadn't been property refrigerated, or it hadn't been properly embalmed, or both. It's unclear.

Of course, the airline wanted to charge a fee of $321 for having to ship the body to the correct location, according to the Daily News:

The funeral home said it shouldn't have to pay the charge and handed over copies of the billing information which had the correct destination on it. Apparently, a worker at the airline had typed in the wrong airport code: GUA for Guatemala instead of GYE for Guayaquil. American apologized and did not charge the fee.

Plan Your Next Getaway
Keep reading

New cruise trend: "Disegalitarianism"

While some cruise lines, such as Cunard, have long catered to the rich, it now seems that every cruise line is wooing them. Royal Caribbean and NCL (Norwegian Cruise Line) are at the forefront of this trend, says WSJ magazine. Royal Caribbean's CEO predicted in March that the next trend in cruising will be "disegalitarianism." That nonsense word means that high-paying customers increasingly want perks such as "priority embarkation" and reserved poolside seating—to name two services that Royal Caribbean will introduce shortly. NCL is also embracing luxury. It made so much profit by charging up to $30,000 a week for a 5,000-square-foot apartment on one of its ships that it recently decided to add super-sized suites to the Gem and the Pearl, too. NCL's Dawn already offers a couple of three-bedroom suites, each with wall-to-wall carpeting and white leather sofas, reports WSJ. And as of this June, passengers on any NCL trip can schedule appointments for Botox injections—a service that, while not necessarily aimed at the wealthy, is not offered at Wal-Mart either. NCL will soon launch F3 ships with grand quarters for the well-off. Each ship will have a bar made of ice; guests will receive fur coats to wear while sipping cocktails in 17-degrees Fahrenheit. Even Carnival, best known for offering value-priced berths, recently added nine spa suites to its Splendor. You can only reach the suites via a private elevator. I don't mind wealthy people enjoying themselves on their own ships, like Cunard's Queen Mary 2. What bothers me is that the spirit of cruising on lines like Carnival is supposed to be about bringing people together. All this segregating of passengers, though, achieves the opposite, as one of my colleagues has noted before. When a cruise line keeps reminding you of your status throughout a trip, it's not relaxing. Far more annoying, however, is when budget travelers feel they have been short shrifted. For instance, NCL markets Freestyle Dining in its premium restaurants as an opportunity to eat wherever you choose. But some passengers find that priority seating now goes to passengers who have paid higher fares. If true, ordinary passengers may be having trouble finding seats at their first choice of restaurant during peak times. Of course, far more people are satisfied with their NCL cruises than not, as shown by the high rate of repeat customers; so maybe there isn't any actual problem here. What do you think? Have you seen any of the cruise lines recently offer shabbier service to budget-conscious travelers than to wealthy travelers?