Are you less likely to fly in 2011?

By Brad Tuttle
October 3, 2012
blog_101230_liquids_popup_original.jpg
Courtesy <a href="http://mybt.budgettravel.com/_Maple-Syrup/photo/12442369/21864.html">Martrese/myBudgetTravel</a>

Fees. Delays. Long lines. Awful customer service. Invasive, humiliating, seemingly random security procedures. The list of annoyances and aggravations related to airline travel just grows and grows.

Every traveler uses some personal mental calculator to figure out when flying, driving, or hopping a train or bus makes the most sense for a given trip. The question is: Have things gotten so bad with air travel that you've recalibrated your personal equation?

Few people are going to board a train from New York to Chicago for a two-day business conference just because they're peeved by baggage fees and TSA checkpoints. But what about shorter-haul flights? Are you more inclined to drive or use ground-based public transportation on a trip that flying would have been a no-brainer in the past?

For that matter, are you shifting the kinds of vacations you're planning and the destinations you'll visit—because flying is more of a headache, less convenient, and less affordable than it's been in the recent past? An executive of an RV maker, for instance, quoted in a Wall Street Journal story about booming recreation vehicle sales, was quoted as saying:

"Our best commercial for our industry is the airlines," Robert J. Olson, chief executive of RV maker Winnebago Industries Inc., told analysts recently. "If you haven't gone on an airline lately, it's a real hassle."

But is it so much of a hassle that you're changing the way you travel, and even the places you travel to? Some travelers won't even consider flying anymore to anywhere within reasonable driving distance.

MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL:

Where are you going in 2011?

6 travel lessons from Europe's "Winterchaos"

It's a new day for flier's rights: We're human beings, and not just cargo!

Plan Your Next Getaway
Keep reading

Instant translations of street signs with your cell phone camera

What if you could point your cell phone video camera at a foreign-language sign and see an instant translation of the words on it? Word Lens allows just that. The iPhone/iPod Touch-only app, released mid-December, uses your camera to perform Spanish-to-English translations, without making a single keystroke on your phone. Want to know what "las salchichas a la parrilla" means on a restaurant sign in front of you? Just point your camera and Word Lens pulls up the relevant English translation ("grilled sausages") immediately and displays it within the image, replacing the Spanish words. So you don't have to go to another screen or wait for more than a half-second. See an astonishing YouTube video of this cool tool: Another huge plus for travelers: Word Lens works with a built-in dictionary. It does not need to connect to the Internet, and your phone is not hit with data charges while roaming in a foreign country. Being offline makes it different to Google Goggles, a straightforward translation app for Android and iPhone devices that provides more accurate translations because it pulls results from the Web. Downsides: Word Lens translations are far from perfect so far, and the tool doesn't recognize handwriting yet. Translations for other languages are in the works, and the focus on Apple products is just the beginning. Word Lens is "free" to download but you have to pay about $5 for each language you want to translated. The tool is currently on a half-price sale through Dec. 31 and is available via iTunes. Find more info about the tool at questvisual.com. MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL A free Google app for point-and-shoot translations Extra Mile Awards 2010: Google Goggles and other tools and people that make travel better Google's new window decals may help travelers Vote now: Help us identify the coolest small town in America!

Theme Parks

How many rides do you ride on a day at Disney?

The number of rides enjoyed by the average Disney park visitor may seem surprisingly low. So what's the average? Nine rides. In a whole day. Considering that a one-day adult ticket costs $87 and change, and entrance for a child age 3 to 9 is $78.81, this means typical visitors are paying roughly $9 or $10 per ride. A recent New York Times story highlights Disney's secret strategies for shortening the lines at park rides, and these efforts -- which include starting parades to draw park goers into less crowded areas, and sending out a Jack Sparrow actor to amuse folks in line at Pirates of the Caribbean&mdash;have sometimes been able to inch the average number of rides to 10 per person per day. Though some Disney enthusiasts enjoy shopping, parades, and other aspects of the experience just as much as the rides, the cost-per-ride ratio still strikes us as pretty excessive. What do you think? Is a three-minute Disney ride worth the equivalent of $9 or $10 a pop? For that matter, if you're an avid Disney visitor, do you tend to hit more or less than 10 rides in a typical day? If so, would you care to offer tips for newbies who are trying to get the most ride-age for their dollars? MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL: Confession of a Disney Cast Member Ask Trip Coach: Walt Disney World Whose Disney World is it? Do you like the idea of a day with no kids at the Disney parks?