San Francisco: Decoding the "healthy surcharge"

By Justine Sharrock
October 3, 2012

If you've been to my fair city recently, you might have noticed that some restaurants have an extra line on the end of the check that reads "Healthy San Francisco Surcharge." This fee allows restaurateurs to help pay for the city's health care program. The small charges vary: Some are a percentage of the total (usually around 4 percent), others tack on a dollar or two.

Not all restaurants include the charge, but by city mandate, all businesses with 20-plus employees have to either offer health insurance or help pay for the city's health care access program, Healthy San Francisco. HSF isn't insurance, per se, but it does offer affordable health care for uninsured residents of the city who don't qualify for Medicare or Medi-Cal.

The city charges businesses $1.31 to $1.96 an hour for each employee who needs HSF, depending on company size. Restaurants, just like other employers, are looking for a way to offset that cost, either by adding a surcharge or by simply increasing menu prices.

HSF is wildly successful and popular (94 percent of users surveyed by the Kaiser Family Foundation expressed satisfaction), but the added restaurant surcharges are controversial.

Most restaurant owners want to offer health care, but they argue that having private businesses (instead of the government) pay for the city's health care program is an unfair financial burden.

Starting in 2008, restaurants like Zuni Cafe, Max's Opera Cafe, and Rose Pistola started adding a "Healthy San Francisco" fee to alert customers to the cost of the program, instead of just raising prices. A group of restaurateurs have even filed a suit against the city arguing the employer mandate violates the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. The U.S. Supreme Court has delayed any action, instead seeking advice of President Obama; he has yet to respond.

Some locals are frustrated. "I'm losing my patience with the way restaurants are handling the 'Healthy San Francisco initiative,'" San Francisco Chronicle food critic Michael Bauer has written on his blog. He argues that restaurants should simply raise the menu prices to cover the HSF costs.

So, how does this affect you? Well, you have to pay the surcharge. But you don't have to include the charge when figuring tip. Many locals see it as an annoyance; but on the flip side, unlike many places in the U.S., San Francisco's waitstaff has access to affordable health care.

Plan Your Next Getaway
Keep reading
Inspiration

Readers' Choice: Ultimate dream destination?

We're giving you the floor! We recognize that our readers are true experts, so we want to hear your thoughts on all sorts of travel topics. Our October 2010 magazine issue will be devoted to what you tell us. Let us know your ultimate dream destination—and why—by posting a comment below. The more details to make your case, the better! PLUS Best value destination? Favorite island getaway? BudgetTravel.com/readerschoice

Inspiration

Live from Rome: Snow!

Snow has been falling steadily over the Forum, Trevi Fountain, and the rest of Rome today for the first time since 2005—and at its heaviest in 24 years. The snow (la neve) has naturally thrilled Romans and tourists alike; Reuters reports that the Pope himself was spotted peering out of a Vatican window. Like D.C., Rome isn't used to dealing with more than a few flurries, so roads are backed up with traffic. Buses and the metro are running with limited delays, according to BusinessWeek, and the Colosseum is temporarily shut. Ciampino airport was closed this morning, but has since reopened. You can see photos submitted by locals to the Rome-based newspaper, La Repubblica, here. Rome's coolest vantage point for these kinds of storms? Inside the Pantheon, where you can watch snowflakes falling through the oculus, a round opening in its dome.

Inspiration

Vietnam: Dinged dong means deals

We recently named Hanoi one of the top budget travel destinations for 2010, and in the past week, it became an even more attractive spot for American travelers. This week, the Vietnamese dong was devalued by more than 3 percent, on top of an cut of 5 percent a few months ago, and the dollar is stronger than ever against it. Compare this to Japan, where the dollar recently fell to a 14-year low against the yen, or Thailand, where the greenback hasn't fared well in 2009 against the baht. Check out our reasons for visiting Hanoi, Vietnam's leafy, atmospheric capital, this year. EARLIER 30-plus readers spill their secrets about Vietnam Tricks for Navigating Southeast Asia's Islands Custom-Made in Saigon

Anybody use one of those special seatbelts made to hold kids in airline seats?

The Child Aviation Restraint System goes by the acronym CARES, a good call because the full name sounds a bit like a pint-size straitjacket. The product made a splash a while back when it came on the market, but since then it's seemed to fade away. I can't recall ever seeing anyone using one on a plane. The CARES harness, designed for kids weighing 22 to 44 pounds and approved by the FAA, serves an obvious purpose. When attached to an airline seat, it holds a child in place with car seat-like over-the-shoulders straps, an arrangement that's much safer and more secure than the standard airline lap belt. If the CARES is like a car seat, why not just bring an actually car seat onto the plane? Well, doing that is a real pain. You've got to lug the car seat through the airport. And, as anyone who has tried to use a car seat on a plane can tell you, airline seats are not designed to accommodate car seats. By some amount of shoving, strapping, and sweating, you can awkwardly get a car seat fastened into an airline seat. But the fit will be less than ideal, and chances are you'll have a toddler whose feet are pressed up against the seat in front of you. And, as anyone who has been around children a bit can tell you, toddlers have been known to kick, if not angrily than simply to stretch their legs. So why hasn't the CARES system been adopted across the board? For one thing, it costs $75, and many parents aren't going to be flying all that often while their kids are in the 22- to 44-pound window, and therefore won't get that much use out of it. But cost can't be the only reason. Have you tried this product? If so, what's your take? Seeing as this is a safety issue, should airlines have a dozen of these harnesses on each plane and loan them out to parents as needed?