Should the government ease all restrictions on Cuba travel?

By Kaeli Conforti
October 3, 2012
blog_5128954042_df4ca4c477_z_original.jpg
Courtesy <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/leshaines123/5128954042/" target="blank">Leshaines123/Flickr</a>

Earlier this year, President Obama spoke about easing a number of travel restrictions in an effort to help the relationship between the United States and Cuba grow stronger. With more and more people now able to visit the island nation, the country has the potential to one day become a major tourist destination, if it isn't already.

As of April 2009, travel restrictions were lifted for any Cuban Americans with immediate family residing in Cuba. In April of this year, more groups were added to the list of those deemed worthy of visiting without restrictions, including students and professors participating in educational activities such as study abroad programs, journalists wishing to attend meetings or conferences, and members of religious or humanitarian organizations recognized by the United States. People in these categories do not have to apply for general license through the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), and Cuban visas are issued upon arrival. In addition, a valid passport is needed to legally enter Cuba, and for eventual re-entry to the United States.

Some restrictions still apply for freelance journalists without the proper credentials and any religious groups not recognized by the United States, however specific licenses can be applied for through OFAC.

Flying to Cuba is becoming easier as well, with several major airports in New York, Miami, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Baltimore, Dallas, New Orleans, Chicago, Pittsburgh, Tampa and San Juan beginning to offer direct charter flights.

While this doesn't mean hoards of flip-flopped American tourists will be flocking to its sandy beaches anytime soon, it's a start.

I've often heard of American citizens booking airfares to Cuba through a third country, typically by way of Mexico or Canada. In regard to this, the U.S. State Department website states the following: "The regulations require that persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction be licensed in order to engage in any travel-related transactions pursuant to travel to, from, and within Cuba." The section on entry requirements to Cuba goes on to say this restriction includes traveling illegally from a third country and that "Travelers who fail to comply with Department of the Treasury regulations could face civil penalties and criminal prosecution upon return to the United States."

In the meantime, Americans aren't the only ones with their eyes on Cuba. Tourists from other countries, including the United Kingdom, Germany, and Japan are flocking to Cuba to take part in "salsa packages" put together by the government and partnered with SprachCaffe, a state-run salsa studio. One of the packages offered by the Culture Ministry offers a two week tour with all dance classes, hotels and most meals included, all for 900 Euros, or roughly $1,300 USD.

In a recent CNN article outlining this new trend, it appears that those living in Cuba want Americans to get in on the salsa movement, too. At the end of the article, a local salsa instructor named Marisuri Garcia says, "We've got Swiss and Germans dancing salsa like Cubans," she says. "It's time to see more Americans!"

What do you think? Should the government ease all restrictions on travel to Cuba?

MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL

Cuba prepares for an end to the travel ban

Mr. Bush, let us go to Cuba!

Travel to Cuba: Highlights

Plan Your Next Getaway
Keep reading
Travel Tips

Breaking up with your favorite destination is hard to do

The world's only museum to tell the story of heartbreak is in the Croatia capital of Zagreb. It has the vivid name of The Museum of Broken Relationships. It showcases tokens of affection from the donors' lost loves and former marriages, such as teddy bears. It's a gallery for broken hearts. But you can be as easily smitten with a favorite destination as with another person. You can also fall out of love with a destination, too. One of the fun things about relationships is that ridiculously giddy feeling you have when things are great. Let's say you're in love with Disneyland. You can't stop talking about Disneyland to your family and friends. Your ears perk up anytime you hear a bit of news about the place, and you can't help chiming in about what you know as an insider&mdash;having been there yourself. It's natural for excitement to wane a bit over time, though. You can't be head over heels about a favorite city, beach, mountain, or tourist attraction your whole life. Your feelings will ebb and flow. if (WIDGETBOX) WIDGETBOX.renderWidget('bdb61f03-aef4-4641-bbe3-4963adfb0cee');Get the Poll Creator Pro widget and many other great free widgets at Widgetbox! Not seeing a widget? (More info)Which leads to this question: When is it time to break-up with a destination, to stop going back, to call it quits? Here are top signs your favorite destination is no longer working for you: 1) When talking about vacation ideas with friends and family, you catch yourself mentioning some other destination far more often than your old favorite. 2) You have trouble planning a repeat visit to your favorite destination. You used to be so enthused to do research and to hear about what's new. But now, before your return trip, you just want to get on the plane and hope that when you arrive some special, old time magic kicks in and makes you feel reconnected. 3) When you arrive, you find yourself complaining more than oohing and ahhing. You feel the place has done you wrong by closing down favorite spots. Or by being overrun by "tourists" or by graffiti or by the opening up multinational chain stores you could find back home. Experiencing two or three of these signs? Trouble is brewing. Consider talking to a travel agent for some independent advice. Maybe there's a new Prague, a new Vegas, a new Kauai out there you haven't yet explored. Maybe at some point, your heart may want to cry out: "Atlantic City, I loved you as a child, I loved you as young adult, but now we're through. We're done. It's over." In the meantime, Croatia needs to invent a special exhibition at its Museum of Broken Relationships&mdash;one that showcases the souvenirs, photos, and mementoes of favorite destinations loved and lost. Has this ever happened to you? Have you ever broken up with a favorite destination? Have you been able to stay on good terms with an ex-favorite destination? Sound off in the comments. We welcome you to also vote in our poll to say whether you've ever been in love with a destination, meaning, repeatedly visited it. Thanks. MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL American Airlines is testing movie streaming to passenger laptops American Express is selling packages to unknown destinations Britain's royal newlyweds are coming to California in July

Cheaper fares for sneaky risk-takers

You can score cheap tickets if you're willing to take risks and pull a sneaky trick or two. This weekend, The New York Times Magazine has reminded people of an old guerrilla tactic called "hidden-city ticketing." It's best explained with an example. As of this morning, Delta.com was charging $600 for a one-way ticket from Austin to Memphis, on this Sunday's flight 3021. But the fare from Austin to Tampa, through Memphis, is just $229&mdash;on the same flight 3021. The reason: There is no nonstop competition that day on the route between Austin and Memphis, a Delta hub. So why not buy the ticket to Tampa and but get off the plane in Memphis before the flight continues on? This strategy is called "hidden-city ticketing" and the opportunities appear most when flying between airports that are underserved by airlines. This sly trick is complicated, risky, and breaks the rules of most airlines. Most airlines ban the practice. On page 17 of Delta's contract of carriage, for example, the airline says it "specifically prohibits the practices commonly known as "Hidden City/Point Beyond Ticketing." Airlines like Delta have set their computers to automatically cancel any remaining portion of a passenger's itinerary when he or she fails to show up for a flight segment. Delta also reserves the right to assess the passenger "the difference between the fare actually paid and the lowest fare applicable to the passenger's actual itinerary." If caught, you may have to pay a penalty fee of about $150, too. If you booked through a travel agent, you could get the agent into hot water. All that said, no one has ever been banned from flying for having gotten caught doing hidden-city ticketing. The New York Times Magazine claims you won't get caught if you act carefully. Don't check a bag, of course, because your bag will go on to your final ticketed destination. Don't share your frequent flier number either, it says, because the airline's computers may be able to pinpoint your irregular behavior and deduct miles from your your account as a penalty. Remember, the gate agent will notice when you are missing from the onward flight, especially if he or she will need to give your now-empty seat to a stand-by passenger. Still, hidden-city ticketing usually isn't practical. In the above example, how do you get home from Memphis? Once again, you have to go to a search engine like Kayak and try a bunch of different flight combinations to find a multi-stop ticket that will work. It can take hours to find combinations that work for each route. You're not checking bags, so you had better hope that there's room in the overhead bin for your luggage. If your bag is gate-checked, it will fly on to the ticketed destination&mdash;which would be a problem. The airlines have a reason to be upset by this practice. It's not the same thing sa buying a two-liter bottle of soda that is on sale for $1 and only drinking some of it instead of buying the smaller, one-liter bottle that is bizarrely $1.49. It's different because when you buy a ticket, you're agreeing to that ticket contract requiring you not to break its rules. If many people broke the rules and did hidden city ticketing, airlines would have to raise prices even more on routes between their hubs and smaller airports. Everyone would be hurt. Yet the airlines have themselves to blame for having so angered the traveling public with their various insults and bizarre pricing practices. No wonder many travelers have no problem with being sneaky like this. [The New York Times Magazine] MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL American Airlines is testing movie streaming to passenger laptops American Express is selling packages to unknown destinations Britain's royal newlyweds are coming to California in July

Travel Tips

Would you pay about $80 for an upgrade?

Starting June 1, Delta will offer long-haul flights with Economy Comfort seats, which will have an additional four inches of legroom, some free booze, priority boarding, free HBO programming on the seatback TVs, and about 50 percent greater angle recline in your seat, says the airline's blog. The seats will be on 108 planes covering most "long-haul intercontinental routes between the U.S. and Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, the Middle East, and South America (Lima, Brasilia, Rio de Janeiro, S&atilde;o Paulo, Buenos Aires, and Santiago)" says the airline. You can't buy the Economy Comfort seats directly. But starting today, you may book an economy-class ticket, and then if one of these seats are available on your flight, you can upgrade to it. Prices vary, but The Points Guy (who broke the story, after Delta's blog) has reports of the cost being about $80 one-way on an East Coast to Europe route. The Economist's Gulliver blog sees upgrade costs as high as $160 one-way. In any event, Delta offers the seats for free to selected members of their frequent flier program, such as those with Diamond and Platinum Medallion status, notes Jaunted. In short, great news for tall travelers with extra money to spend. Full details on Economy Comfort on Delta's site. Delta joins a string of airlines with a medium upgrade option, such as to United/Continental's Economy Plus. Southwest is now the only airline not to offer a comparable service. Reaction so far has been mixed. Gulliver, for instance, has mocked the name: "If you name your premium-economy seating "Economy Comfort," what not-very-subliminal message are you giving about the joys of your regular economy seating?" It's also criticized some of the details. "Early boarding is not much of a lure on an international flight with allocated seats." But what truly matters is what fliers like you think. Would you pay about $80 for an upgrade? Please vote in our poll or sound off with a comment below. Thanks! MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL American Airlines is testing movie streaming to passenger laptops American Express is selling packages to unknown destinations Britain's royal newlyweds are coming to California in July

News

Poll: Would you pay for American's new pay-per-view movies?

American Airlines is testing a service that streams video content on flights. For a fee, a passenger could watch movies or TV episodes on his or her laptop while in the air, reports USA Today. A movie is expected to cost about $4 and a TV episode about $2, though prices haven't been finalized yet. You won't have to pay additional fees beyond that. Lucky passengers on two transcontinental American routes will soon be able to test the service. American says it is adding AC powerports to all of its economy class sections by the end of this year, so that batteries don't drain. One way of looking at this news is that airlines may start charging for in-flight movies, a former free perk for everyone on long flights. Airlines may also soon expect you to bring your own "screen" via a laptop or tablet to watch a movie or TV show, which could lead to the removal of TVs shared by everyone. if (WIDGETBOX) WIDGETBOX.renderWidget('63092411-62f0-425e-842a-e148415bced4');Get the Poll Creator Pro widget and many other great free widgets at Widgetbox! Not seeing a widget? (More info)A more positive look at this news is that airlines are improving their on-board entertainment options, giving passengers broader choices. You're more likely to have something entertaining to watch when you can choose from hundreds of choices. No reporter has test-driven American's service yet, so no one knows if it works well. The movies are stored on a server on a plane and transmitted wirelessly. No air-to-ground connection is needed, except at the beginning of the process, when users need to pay for the movie by credit card over WiFi, reports The Cranky Flier. What do you think? Would you pay about $4 to for a menu of thousands of on-demand movies and TV shows that you could stream onto your own device mid-flight? Please vote in our poll.