Breaking down Italy's slew of new hotel taxes

By Michelle Baran
October 3, 2012
Courtesy Michelle Baran

You may have recalled reading something somewhere in the past couple months about a new hotel tax in Rome. Or was it Venice? Or Florence? Or all of them?

Well, it was all of them, and some other cities in Italy too. Basically, Italian municipalities are on the hunt for additional revenue sources in the wake of government funding cuts as the country's economy and budget falters.

To compensate, this year, at least eight cities in Italy have added a hotel tax of between 1 and 5 euros (between $1.40 and $7, based on current exchange rates), per person, per night. They include Rome, Venice, Florence, Padua, and Giardini Naxos on the island of Sicily.

For a complete list of the cities, the hotel taxes, and when they are in effect, see our chart.

So, what does this mean for you, the traveler? Well, it means that when you check out of your hotel in one of these cities listed, from here on out you should expect to find an additional charge at the bottom of your bill, one that can range considerably depending on the star-rating of your hotel, how many of you are traveling together and how many nights you're staying.

Now, if you've already booked a vacation package to Italy, you might check with the travel provider to see if you're going to have to pay or if they're going to absorb the tax, as several travel companies have come out with statements that they're going to actually absorb the taxes into their 2011 and 2012 prices since they were put into effect so last-minute.

The Globus family of brands, for instance, recently put out a release that it is absorbing the cost of the taxes, a decision that is costing the company more than $1 million this year alone.

Insight Vacations also stated earlier this summer that it would absorb the cost of hotel taxes in Florence and Venice.

Perillo, an Italy vacation specialist, is absorbing the cost of the hotel taxes for its group departures, but people who book through its independent travel website,, will pay the hotel directly and therefore pay the taxes themselves.

"These taxes represent less than 1 percent of the average tour cost with air, so it's more of an administrative hassle than having a big impact on the final price," said Diane Ferro, product manager at Perillo. But, she noted, "we are already at a disadvantage with the current rate of exchange and we did not need to add on another fee."

Indeed, Tom Jenkins, executive director of the European Tour Operators Association, which focuses on inbound travel to Europe, and Terry Dale, president of the U.S. Tour Operators Association, whose members sell travel to Europe, have been lobbying the Italian government to ease up on the taxes. In a joint letter to Italy's tourism minister in late June they argued that, "underlying the imposition of these taxes is an assumption that tourists can be exploited as a natural resource."

Thoughts on the new hotel taxes and how and whether they will impact your Italy travel plans?

More from Budget Travel:

Poll: Are quick trips abroad worth the travel time?

Theft from luggage at airports and how to avoid it

Heading to Europe? Have a Blue Lagoon layover

Keep reading

DC restaurant bans cell phones! Good idea?

Rogue24 restaurant of Washington, D.C., has had it with cell phones. Guests face a no-tolerance ban on both cell phones and photography of any kind. There are a few reasons for the ban: Cell phone ringer volume isn't controlled and many, many times, they have disturbed other customers, says the owner RJ Cooper. Plus, smart phones often have cameras, and the act of taking photos in the dining room is disturbing to other customers. See the document patrons have to sign here. So watch what you tweet. Here's Rogue24's chef's explanation of the policy, courtesy of the blog Eater D.C. Do you think it's unfair to ask guests to not do that at your restaurant when it's so prevalent at other restaurants? Let's say you're out on a date, but you sit there Tweeting. What are you doing to your companion? You're alienating them. You're in an environment that's trying to create an ambience that you can't get anywhere else. If you go to the theater, they ask you to not use flash photography, because it distracts. It's the same thing here. We're in the middle of the dining room, so the flashing distracts us as well. Why no phones or photos? It's really about being polite to your fellow guests and your dining companions. If everyone brings out their phones, it detracts from the experience. We're not telling you not to tweet; we have areas to do that. You can do it in the salon or the bathroom. We just don't want cell phones in the dining room. You wouldn't ask a guest to leave if you saw them taking a picture? No, because it's not about being a cop or a Nazi. So, enough about this chef. What do you think? Do you think more restaurants should put a ban on cell phones and photography into place at high-end restaurants? I know I do. I was at a restaurant the other day, when somebody's cell phone rang. It wasn't the ring-a-ling, ding-a-ling type of ring. It was one of those song rings; you know the ones. It was distracting. So was listening to the conversation that happened. I've also been blinded by photography. During one dinner, I was distracted by more than a half-dozen camera flashes in the middle of my meal. I was having a dinner at a restaurant in the D.C. area called L'Auberge Chez François. (I know, I know. It's not very "budget travel." It was a splash-out dinner before I got the Budget Travel gig. Cut me some slack.) I realize that it was a splash-out dinner for other patrons, too, and they wanted to cherish the occasion with a photographic memorie and perhaps share images of the great meal with friends. But, please. It's dinner at a fancy restaurant. Let's have some manners. Do you really need to document your entire lives? Can't you just remember a meal as being good? Or describe it to your friends? if (WIDGETBOX) WIDGETBOX.renderWidget('47e16142-e70f-4b8b-a291-49bcca78b00f');Get the Poll Creator Pro widget and many other great free widgets at Widgetbox! Not seeing a widget? (More info)Okay, okay. I know I'm being cranky. Sorry. Chime in with your own opinions by posting a comment below. Or vote in our handy-dandy poll! Thanks for your time, as always. MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL 5 best new ice pops in the U.S. Use BiteHunter to save money on eating out Canada's worst decision ever


East Coast tries to untangle post-Irene travel mess

More than 13,000 flights have been cancelled leaving hundreds of thousands of passengers stranded in the aftermath of Tropical Storm Irene, which struck the East Coast over the weekend. According to news reports citing the flight tracking service there have been nearly 1,500 cancelled flights on Monday, adding to the nearly 12,000 flights grounded over the weekend. The cancellations and delays have impacted between 650,000 and 700,000 air travelers creating a passenger backlog just before the nation heads into the busy Labor Day holiday weekend. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey said that John F. Kennedy International and Newark Liberty International airports both reopened on Monday morning at 6 a.m. with departures set to resume at noon on Monday. LaGuardia Airport will reopen to both arrivals and departures at 7 a.m. on Tuesday. As the airports and airlines attempt to untangle the mess of travelers left stranded due the cancellations and closures, the Port Authority advised travelers to contact their airlines before heading to the airport to find out if there are any further delays or cancellations. The Port Authority also advised travelers that due to more limited mass transit options, passengers should double-check their plans for getting to and from the airport. As for train travel, Amtrak said that it will operate most Northeast Regional trains between Philadelphia and Washington starting on Monday, but that all Amtrak service between Boston and Philadelphia is canceled due to the extensive flooding, debris on tracks, and power issues as a result of Irene. Additionally, all Acela Express service between Boston and Washington is currently canceled. NJ Transit rail service will also remain suspended until further notice as a result of Irene, with the exception of the Atlantic City Rail Line. NJ Transit said it will operate bus and light rail service on a modified schedule on Monday and that crews are working around the clock to assess storm damage and make necessary repairs. Over the weekend, much of the East Coast and Northeast had braced for what was expected to be a potentially devastating hurricane or tropical storm once it made landfall. But in the end, some of the hardest hit areas were in upstate New York and Vermont, which experienced severe flooding, The New York Times reported. What about you? Has Irene foiled your travel plans in some way? Are you stranded somewhere? How has your home or community been impacted? Share your Irene stories below. More from Budget Travel: Prepping for hurricane season How are airlines responding to Hurricane Irene? The Empire State Building turns 80


Survey: Travelers just love alternative airports

Come to think of it, since smaller gateways typically come with cheaper fares, smaller lines, fewer delays, and less stress, what's not to love? When's the last time you would describe traveling through an airport as a "happy experience"? Your answer probably depends on which airports you fly from, to, and through. According to a new survey conducted by Harris Interactive, 88 percent of passengers flying through alternative airports report having a "happy experience" at these smaller, B- or C-list gateways. What's more, 77 percent said that flying via alternative airports is less stressful than traveling through the likes of JFK, ATL, and LAX, and 92 percent of adults who've flown through an alternative airport in the last year said they would do so again. Generally speaking, the alterna-airport experience is not only less stressful and (dare we say) happier, but cheaper as well. The average fares at Milwaukee's General Mitchell International Airport, for instance, are $108 less than nearby Chicago O'Hare. Parking is also typically far less expensive at smaller airports: The economy lots start at $18 a day at Boston Logan, but just $10 daily at Manchester (NH) and $6 per day at Hartford's Bradley airport. One way to ensure an unhappy airport experience is to be subject to flight delays. To little surprise, the latest list of the 100 most-delayed flights (covered by the Wall Street Journal among others) is riddled with routes departing and landing in major airports like Chicago O'Hare and Atlanta-Hartsfield. And the worst culprit of all? That dubious title belongs to Newark Liberty International, where 40 out of the 100 most-delayed flights take off or arrive. MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL: We want to know your airport secrets 5 airport innovations worth praising Airports You Love


Apple plans to block iPhone users from recording concerts

Have you ever noticed people at concerts using their smartphone cameras to capture the moment? (Admit it, you've probably done it, too.) Now, a patent filed by Apple aims to use infrared sensor technology to prevent people from recording a performance or snapping a photo. According to a New York Times article, the patent applies to any mobile device made by Apple that has a built–in camera—that means any iPhones, iPads, or the iPod Touch. Here's the plan in a nut shell: Rather than recording a video clip of your favorite artist's performance, sensors coming from the stage will temporarily block the camera's recording features. The idea is to maintain the artist's rights and prevent bootlegged performances from getting online. (Technically, the idea could also be extended to include Broadway shows and movie theaters if bootlegging is the real problem.) Apple is also considering using the same infrared sensors to embed a watermark into any photos taken at such venues as museums, zoos or aquariums, not necessarily a bad thing if you're on vacation and can't remember where a photo was taken. Another idea regarding photography at museums uses sensors to deliver information about the painting or artwork you're interested in taking a picture of. The patent was filed by Apple in 2009 and published by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Thursday, June 2nd, 2011. An article by The Washington Post stresses the fact that this is just a patent filing, "which means it's far from certain that the company will actually use the technology at all." I reached out to Apple to get their take on this topic and was told that they are unable to provide an official comment at this time. Personally, I don't like the sound of this one at all. First of all, if I'm willing to spend my hard–earned money on a piece of fancy technology, don't I have the right to use it? It's not like the quality is up to par with media-level photography. Besides, what if I just want to take photos of my friends at the concerts? If I'm paying for a ticket to a concert, shouldn't I have the right to snap photos of my friends at the venue? Shouldn't I be able to share a clip of the evening with my friends via social media or email a quick picture of a beautiful statue without having a watermark in the way? What do you think of this? Do you think Apple is on to something or is the company taking things too far? MORE FROM BUDGET TRAVEL iPads Take on Hotels, Airlines and the Eiffel Tower The Ultimate Guide to Travel Apps Test Lab: iPad as Travel Tool